SURVEY MISSING_AREAS
I agree but the technology and programming needed to do that is much more advanced and beyond my
capability.
Cape Code is thinner than the present RUC model resolution!
(PS I used to soar out of Plymouth.)
6 =========== Sam Zimmerman *AT* SPA Spartanburg,SC
I hesitate to comment herefor fear mythoughts will sound
critical. But, in the best of all worlds, overlap would help. Sites
such as Cordele and Parawon, lie at the edge of a region wher overlap
would enhance the usefulness substntially.
24 =========== Lee Kuhlke *AT* Kelly Airpark
Is it possible to make one large map of the US and we could "box" the
area that we want to look at?. This would save multiple maps and make
it easier for those of us on the border regions
30 =========== ---------- *AT* Mt. Diablo
Mexico - Tapalpa (Guadalajara) and Valle de Bravo (Mexico).
31 =========== ---------- *AT* Moriarty, NM
Better resolution would be very helpful. When I look a New Mexico it
is hard to pick out specific areas due to a lack of detail. Better
resolution will solve this "issue." Thanks!
38 =========== Daniel L Johnson *AT* KLUM, Menomonie, WI
The advantage of overlap is that some of us live near the edge of a
region; in addition, the wx moves W -> E, so that it's useful to look
at the region just to the west. In addition, those of us at the
northern edge of BLIPmap coverage would likely be happy of some of
that "overlap" involved an expansion of the northern border.
40 =========== ---------- *AT* Arlington, WA and Ephrata, WA
east montana, downwind flight from EPH, WA is to Butte, MT, coverage
further east might be useful.
57 =========== Jim Fryett *AT* Arthur East ON
I fly in Southern Ontario - this area is well covered and is generally
acceptable - higher resolution would be helpful
61 =========== ken grosh *AT* alliance, NE
Western edge of South Dakota & eastern edges of Wyoming & Montana
62 =========== john cochrane *AT* chicago glider IL
On size: current coverage is about right for the range of most xc
glider flying. I'm fine with slightly bigger maps -- monitors are big
these days.
68 =========== John H. Bisscheroux *AT* Hawkesbury, ON Canada
Mt Tremblant latitude. This is a much used mountain (hill?) soaring
region.
78 =========== Steve Koerner *AT* Peoria AZ
I often desire more coverage to the west on SW map
83 =========== Harold Klaser *AT* New Castle, VA
My area is already covered
86 =========== Richard Lewanczuk *AT* Chipman, AB, Canada
OK, I obviously have a vested interest, but a bit more northerly for
Alberta, Canada.
96 =========== Tim Traynor *AT* Pullman, WA
More of Minnesota, I may be moving there in a year or two.
98 =========== ---------- *AT* Hyner
N/A
101 =========== ---------- *AT* Ellenville, NY
Cape Cod is a narrow sliver of land but it has one soaring airport on
it. We also intend to extend our XC distances by going out
there. Currently the NE map cuts off Cape Cod.
109 =========== Hugo Vifian *AT* Hollister
I just love to fly South towards the Condor Sanctuary (South-west of
New Cuyama and sometimes it is critical to know whether to fly East
(west of Highway 5) or West (along the Machesna and Madre Mtn ridge or
in between along the Caliente Range. If there was more resolution and
a bigger picture it would be easy to figure that out ahead of the
flight.
118 =========== ---------- *AT* Tullahoma, TN
Entire Appalacian chain in one image if possible.
134 =========== Alan Hoar *AT* Black Diamond, Alberta, Canada
Further north on the north west region(further into Canada) would be
usefull.