THE THIRD ANNUAL BLIPMAP USER SURVEY - 2004
April 2005

>>>>> THE 2004 SURVEY HAS NOW ENDED <<<<<
THE SUMMARIZED RESULTS ARE GIVEN BELOW

          Results from the third BLIPMAP User Survey (which ran from Apr 26 to May 26, 2004) are given below as red overlay on the original survey form or as a link for extracted comments.  The voting percentage or average was computed only for those respondents who answered that question, which is indicated in brackets [#] (note that questions allowing multiple responses can total to more than 100%!).
          A listing of the comments (from those who opted to allow their comments to be viewed) is provided in several links.  Several of the comments are location specific, so the location from which each came is indicated - and if the pilot specified that their survey could be made public their name is also given.  I have also edited some comments to remove personal messages or names.  I have added a few comments on the comments when a short response would suffice, but did not do so if a lengthy response would be required.  
          The total number of participants was 158.  My sincere thanks to all those who took time to participate - those who allowed their names to be made public are listed in the public key.


About You

Name:
   

Home Airport / Launch Point (please include city and 2-letter state ID):
   

Registration/Subscription Status: I am:
    0%  [157]  not Registered
    1%  [157]  Registered-only (not subscribed)
    11%  [157]  a RUC-model Subscriber
    6%  [157]  a ETA-model Subscriber
    82%  [157]  Subscribed to both models

If you will permit an email to obtain additional feedback, enter your email address:
   

Survey privacy: This survey can be seen by:
    60%  [158]  anyone
    2%  [158]  just Dr.Jack, but my comments can be extracted and posted anonymously
    38%  [158]  just Dr.Jack, and my comments can NOT be extracted and posted anonymously

What you fly: (multiple choice possible)
    89%  [157]  Sailplane
    12%  [157]  HangGlider
    6 %  [157]  ParaGlider
    21%  [157]  Power Plane
    0 %  [157]  No flying done at present time

Region(s) in which you have used BLIPMAP: (multiple choice possible)
    23%  [158]  NorthEast
    19%  [158]  SouthEast
    14%  [158]  NorthCentral
    9 %  [158]  SouthCentral
    6 %  [158]  GreatPlains
    14%  [158]  OK/TX
    13%  [158]  NorthWest
    34%  [158]  SouthWest
    38%  [158]  CA/NV

Type(s) of flying: (multiple choice possible)
    71%  [156]  Local
    95%  [156]  CrossCountry
    35%  [156]  Contest
    30%  [156]  Record

National aviation associations(s) you belong to: (multiple choice possible)
    87%  [155]  SSA
    16%  [155]  USHGA
    7 %  [155]  Soaring Association of Canada
    3 %  [155]  Any other national soaring association
    55%  [155]  AOPA
    18%  [155]  EAA
    5 %  [155]  Any other national powerplane association

Enter any comment needed to clarify the above:  (optional)
(for overall comments on BLIPMAPs, please use the comment box at the end of the form!)
Link to comments


About your BLIPMAP use

How many days (approx.) did you fly in 2004:
    54  days ±51  [min-max=2-325]  [156] 

After you knew about BLIPMAPs, on what percentage of your flights did you obtain a BLIPMAP-based forecast prior to the flight:
    85  % ±22  [min-max=15-100]  [155]  %

During the soaring season, how many times did you look at the BLIPMAP forecasts during an average week:
    7  times ±9  [min-max=1-100]  [155] 

How many total days have you flown based on a BLIPMAP forecast when you otherwise would not have flown:
    8  days ±9  [min-max=0-60]  [142] 

How many times have you canceled a planned soaring day because BLIPMAPs predicted a poor day:
    7  times ±7  [min-max=0-45]  [146] 

If you work, on how many "work days" have you taken time off or rescheduled work so that you could fly based on a BLIPMAP forecast:
    4  days ±5  [min-max=0-30]  [118] 

What (guessimated) percentage of active pilots at your soaring site now use BLIPMAP forecasts:
    51  % ±29  [min-max=0-100]  [145] 

Have you ever used a BLIPMAP forecast secondhand, i.e. someone else actually looked at the BLIPMAP and gave you a forecast based on it
    66%  [155]  Yes
    33%  [155]  No

If you have used BLIPMAPs for task planning and/or choice of flight direction, how valuable has that been for those purposes
    10%  [147]  Not used for task planning
    56%  [147]  Extremely useful
    35%  [147]  Useful
    0%  [147]  Not Useful

When using BLIPMAP forecasts, do you look at
    39%  [155]  Only forecasts for a single (18/21Z) time
    61%  [155]  Forecasts for multiple times of the day

What percentage of your BLIPMAP use is for RUC model forecasts
    7%  [151]  0%
    15%  [151]  25%
    34%  [151]  50%
    20%  [151]  75%
    24%  [151]  100%

What percentage of your BLIPMAP use is for ETA model forecasts
    13%  [142]  0%
    20%  [142]  25%
    36%  [142]  50%
    19%  [142]  75%
    13%  [142]  100%

IF you use one of the viewers, you can choose between either "Classic" colors (all available colors are used between the parameter's maximum and minimum value) or "Fixed" colors (each color always represent the same pre-set increment).  Which do you prefer:
    29%  [144]  "Classic" colors
    5 %  [144]  "Fixed" colors
    31%  [144]  Varies
    36%  [144]  No preference

Enter any comment which clarifies your BLIPMAP use:  (optional)
(for overall comments on BLIPMAPs, please use the comment box at the end of the form!)
Link to comments


About BLIPMAP Usefulness

Overall, how would you rate the usefulness of BLIPMAPs for planning your flight weatherwise:
    57%  [157]  Extremely useful
    29%  [157]  Very Useful
    14%  [157]  Generally Useful
    1 %  [157]  Marginally Useful
    0 %  [157]  Not Useful

For as many of the following parameters in which you have an interest, please give your impression of their usefulness

Parameter Usage Comments
(optional)
Thermal Updraft Velocity
(W*)
0 %  [157]  NOT Understood
7 %  [157]  Understood but NOT Used
93%  [157]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
Height of BL Top 1 %  [156]  NOT Understood
13%  [156]  Understood but NOT Used
87%  [156]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
Height of
Critical Updraft Strength
(Hcrit)
3 %  [155]  NOT Understood
14%  [155]  Understood but NOT Used
83%  [155]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
Thermal Height Variability 15%  [152]  NOT Understood
47%  [152]  Understood but NOT Used
38%  [152]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
Buoyancy/Shear Ratio
(B/S)
19%  [153]  NOT Understood
12%  [153]  Understood but NOT Used
69%  [153]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
Wind Speed in BL 1 %  [155]  NOT Understood
16%  [155]  Understood but NOT Used
83%  [155]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
Wind Direction in BL 1 %  [154]  NOT Understood
17%  [154]  Understood but NOT Used
82%  [154]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
Wind Shear in BL 27 %  [100]  NOT Understood
39%  [100]  Understood but NOT Used
34%  [100]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
BL Max Up/Down Motion
(Convergence)
41%  [151]  NOT Understood
32%  [151]  Understood but NOT Used
27%  [151]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
Cumulus Potential 5 %  [152]  NOT Understood
13%  [152]  Understood but NOT Used
82%  [152]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
Cumulus Cloudbase
(Surface LCL)
6 %  [152]  NOT Understood
18%  [152]  Understood but NOT Used
76%  [152]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
OverDevelopment Potential 5 %  [153]  NOT Understood
16%  [153]  Understood but NOT Used
79%  [153]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
OD Cloudbase
(BL Condensation Level)
21%  [149]  NOT Understood
41%  [149]  Understood but NOT Used
38%  [149]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
BL Relative Humidity Max 38%  [149]  NOT Understood
48%  [149]  Understood but NOT Used
14%  [149]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
C A P E
(Convective Available
Potential Energy)
54%  [153]  NOT Understood
19%  [153]  Understood but NOT Used
27%  [153]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
BL Depth 38%  [151]  NOT Understood
32%  [151]  Understood but NOT Used
31%  [151]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
Surface Heating 26%  [152]  NOT Understood
41%  [152]  Understood but NOT Used
33%  [152]  Understood and Used
Link to comments
Surface Temperature 13 %  [100]  NOT Understood
54%  [100]  Understood but NOT Used
33%  [100]  Understood and Used
Link to comments

Enter any general comment which clarifies the above usability info:  (optional)
(for overall comments on BLIPMAPs, please use the comment box at the end of the form!)
Link to comments


About BLIPMAP improvements or changes

How useful would the addition of a surface wind prediction be to you:
    13%  [150]  Not Useful
    60%  [150]  Useful
    27%  [150]  Extremely useful

This summer RUC forecasts are expected to improve to a resolution of 13km (vice the current 20km).  When making the necessary changes, I must decide whether to (1) keep the map image size the same, or (2) improve resolution by using the same pixels per grid point ratio and thus make the map image 50% larger, or (3) do something in between.  At the same time I might also increase the area covered by each region to allow more overlap between the regions, which would also increase the image size.  The downside of increasing the map image size is that it would be more difficult to view on smaller monitors, since they could not display the entire image on their screen.  Your preference for the map image size would be:
    17%  [147]  Keep Same Size
    7 %  [147]  Increase Size by 15%
    12%  [147]  Increase Size by 33%
    44%  [147]  Increase Size by 50%
    14%  [147]  Increase Size by 100%
    5 %  [147]  Increase Size by more than 100%

IF the map image size is increased, should this be done (1) to provide enhanced resolution over the same map region as before, (2) to increase the area covered by each map and thus increase regional overlap, but keeping resolution the same, or (3) increase both resolution and regional overlap ?
    55%  [141]  Better Resolution Only
    9 %  [141]  More Regional Overlap Only
    36%  [141]  Both better resolution and more overlap

Is there any area not covered by the present regions that you think should be covered?  If so, indicate the area you would like to have added.
Link to comments

Would you like to have a specific piece of BLIPMAP information provided on the website ?  If so, indicate what you would like to see added in the comment box below.
Link to comments

Is there is a particularly important BLIPMAP improvement not mentioned above that you would like to see incorporated (if possible), describe that in the comment box below.
Link to comments


Miscellaneous

The time I needed to complete this survey was (approximately):
    9  minutes ±7  [min-max=0-60 ]  [153] 

That survey completion time is:
    18%  [151]  Shorter than I anticipated
    82%  [151]  A reasonable time
    0 %  [151]  Longer than I anticipated
    0 %  [151]  Much too long

Enter any comments on this survey itself:  (optional)
Link to comments

Enter any overall comments on BLIPMAP or comment on anything not addressed elsewhere in the survey:  (optional)
Link to comments